The global movement toward psychedelic legalization is gaining momentum, with countries reconsidering laws surrounding substances like psilocybin mushrooms, MDMA, and LSD. In South Africa, Shelly-Cathy Faulds has emerged as a leading figure in the fight for psilocybin legalization. Her personal experience, legal battle, and advocacy work are shaping the national conversation around the medical and spiritual use of psychedelics.
By – Warren Whitfield
Beyond Faulds’ case, South Africa’s legal landscape is witnessing multiple constitutional challenges in the High Court concerning the criminalization of psilocybin. These cases seek to reshape drug policy by emphasizing human rights, medical research, and the recognition of indigenous and spiritual practices. This article explores Faulds’ journey, the broader implications of her legal battle, and other ongoing cases challenging South Africa’s drug laws.
Who is Shelly-Cathy Faulds?
Shelly-Cathy Faulds is a South African therapist, shamanic healer, and advocate for plant medicine. She specializes in psilocybin-assisted therapy, helping individuals struggling with trauma, depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Faulds is among a growing group of therapists, researchers, and advocates worldwide pushing for the decriminalization of psilocybin due to its profound therapeutic benefits.
Her work aligns with the global movement that recognizes psychedelics not as recreational drugs but as powerful tools for healing, personal growth, and mental well-being. In South Africa, where mental health care is often underfunded and inaccessible to many, psilocybin offers a potential breakthrough.
The Arrest That Sparked a Legal Battle
In March 2021, Faulds and her husband, Derek Faulds, were arrested in Somerset West after police found 142.4 grams of psilocybin mushrooms in their possession. Under South African law, psilocybin is classified as a Schedule 7 substance, meaning it is considered to have no accepted medical use and carries severe penalties for possession, cultivation, or distribution.
Rather than accepting a plea deal or quietly serving a sentence, Faulds decided to challenge the constitutionality of psilocybin prohibition. She filed a legal case against the Ministers of Justice, Health, and Police, as well as the National Director of Public Prosecutions, arguing that the ban on psilocybin mushrooms violates several rights guaranteed by South Africa’s Constitution.
Her case raises critical questions:
- Does the criminalization of psilocybin violate the right to healthcare and bodily autonomy?
- Should South Africans have the freedom to use psychedelics for religious and spiritual purposes?
- Can the government justify maintaining a prohibition when scientific evidence supports psilocybin’s medical benefits?
Legal Arguments for Psilocybin Decriminalization
- The Right to Healthcare (Section 27 of the Constitution)
Faulds and her legal team argue that banning psilocybin infringes on South Africans’ constitutional right to healthcare. Research from institutions like Johns Hopkins University and Imperial College London has demonstrated that psilocybin is effective in treating depression, PTSD, and substance addiction. In countries like the U.S., Canada, and Australia, psilocybin-assisted therapy is already being explored as a legitimate medical treatment.
- The Right to Privacy (Section 14 of the Constitution)
One of the strongest legal arguments for psilocybin decriminalization is the right to privacy. In 2018, South Africa’s Constitutional Court decriminalized the private use and cultivation of cannabis, ruling that banning personal cannabis use violated privacy rights. Many legal experts believe that the same argument applies to psilocybin: adults should have the right to use, possess, and cultivate psilocybin mushrooms within the privacy of their own homes.
- The Right to Freedom of Religion and Spiritual Practice
Psychedelics have a long history of religious and spiritual use in various cultures. Indigenous communities in South America, Africa, and North America have used psilocybin-containing mushrooms for centuries in healing and ceremonial practices. Faulds and other advocates argue that South Africans should have the religious freedom to engage in traditional psychedelic healing practices without legal persecution.
- The Lack of Scientific Justification for Criminalization
Critics argue that psilocybin’s Schedule 7 classification is outdated and not based on scientific evidence. Unlike addictive substances such as alcohol, nicotine, and opioids, psilocybin is non-toxic, non-addictive, and has a low risk of abuse. Recent studies even suggest that psilocybin may help treat addiction rather than contribute to it.
Other Major Psychedelic Legal Cases in South Africa
The Faulds case is not the only legal challenge related to psychedelic drugs in South Africa. Several high-profile cases are making their way through the courts.
- Cromhout & Ferguson v. Minister of Justice (2024)
In April 2024, the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria heard a groundbreaking case (Case No: 2024-040119) filed by Monica Cromhout and journalist Melinda Ferguson. Their legal team argued that the criminalization of psilocybin mushrooms violated the right to privacy.
**Court R
Shelly-Cathy Faulds, a South African therapist and shamanic practitioner, has become a central figure in the movement to decriminalize psilocybin mushrooms in South Africa. Her journey from arrest to advocacy highlights the complex interplay between personal freedom, therapeutic potential, and legal constraints.
Other articles on the subject
The Arrest and Legal Challenge
In March 2021, Shelly-Cathy and her husband, Derek Faulds, were arrested in Somerset West for possessing 142.4 grams of psilocybin-containing mushrooms. This incident led them to challenge the constitutionality of South Africa’s prohibition on psilocybin and psilocin. They argue that the criminalization of these substances infringes upon several rights enshrined in the Bill of Rights, including access to healthcare services, privacy, and freedom of religion. Their legal action targets key governmental figures, such as the Ministers of Justice, Health, and Police, as well as the National Director of Public Prosecutions.
Advocacy for Therapeutic Use
Beyond the courtroom, Faulds emphasizes the therapeutic potential of psilocybin. She highlights its efficacy in treating mental health disorders like depression, anxiety, and PTSD. Faulds contends that psilocybin is non-addictive and has well-documented therapeutic benefits, making its prohibition unjustifiable.
Broader Legal Context in South Africa
The Faulds’ case is part of a broader movement challenging the legal status of psilocybin in South Africa. In April 2024, the Gauteng Division of the High Court in Pretoria heard the case of Monica Cromhout and Melinda Ferguson v. Minister of Justice and Constitutional Development and Others (Case No: 2024-040119). The applicants argued that the criminalization of psilocybin mushrooms infringes upon constitutional rights, particularly the right to privacy. They contended that adults should be allowed to use, possess, and cultivate psilocybin mushrooms within their private spaces without fear of prosecution.
In a landmark judgment delivered on April 23, 2024, the court declared that the prohibition of psilocybin and psilocin was unconstitutional to the extent that it criminalized the private use, possession, and cultivation of these substances by adults for personal consumption. The court suspended the declaration of invalidity for 24 months to allow Parliament to amend the relevant legislation. In the interim, the court provided temporary relief, permitting adults to use, possess, and cultivate psilocybin mushrooms in private for personal use.
The Path Forward
These legal challenges reflect a growing recognition of the potential benefits of psilocybin and a reevaluation of its legal status in South Africa. Advocates like Shelly-Cathy Faulds continue to play a crucial role in this evolving landscape, pushing for reforms that align with contemporary understandings of psychedelics and their uses.